The IDNO-site is back online and serves as the archived history of a sabotaged attempt to organize the Individual Domain Name Owners. There is currently no active mailing list for the IDNO.


 

The ICANN Bylaws provide for a number of SO's (supporting organizations) to help it formulate policy.

The SO dealing with Domain Names was called the DNSO. (With the departure of the ccTLD's , this has now been further watered down to GNSO-Generioc Names SO)

The DNSO consisted of a number of recognized interest groups or "constituencies", seven of which had been created and ordained by the Interim ICANN Board at the Singapore meeting in March 1999.

The ICANN Bylaws used to provide for new "bottom-up" constituency formation in this DNSO.

We proposed the IDNO constituency.

We have petitioned the interim ICANN Board to recognize us as a DNSO constituency. This petition was initially stonewalled by the ICANN Board.

Finally, in Stockholm, the Board referred the matter to the Names Council of the DNSO for a recommendation. That was the meagre fruit of 2 years of lobbying.

For a cartoonist view of the ICANN stage look here. :-)

For a more serious and solid review of the representation issue, please read Jon Weinberg's article Geeks and Greeks.

The IDNO has been organized to provide effective representation at the ICANN meeting in Berlin (May 25-27, 1999) and at subsequent ICANN functions. [Constituency definitions and functions are available at the ICANN web site, see the Amendment to ICANN Bylaws, Article. VI-B, Sec.3;]

Yes, we were also in Santiago, Chile (Aug 23 to 27, 1999) for the first open ICANN Board meeting.

AND we were in Los Angeles (Nov 1 to 4,1999) with Karl Auerbach as our elected spokesman.

We have been unable to physically represent you in Cairo (but we were there on-line) For a press report see Jeri Clausing's NY Times article.

Joop Teernstra has acted as spokesman at the ICANN meetings in Yokohama

(july 2000) .

We have come out in support of the Civil Society Forum in Yokohama on 13 July, 2000

Report from Yokohama (17 July, 2000)

Please view the Draft "Yokohama Statement" of the Internet Democracy Project

We had IDNO members attending the
ICANN-Melbourne meeting (March 9-13,2001)

Karl and Joop, meeting in Melbourne

Melbourne report (March, 2001)

We have been pleading your case again in Stockholm

Stockholm report

Montevideo, Uruguay. 3- 7 September, 2001 GA address by Joop Teernstra. Comment on the At Large Study and stressing the need for a Mezzanine Consensus level.

Marina del Rey, November 12-15, 2001. A statement endorsed by the majority of the membership will be read to the General Assembly of the DNSO.

 

 

Background

For the list of the initial recognized constituencies please consult the ICANN constituencies page. If you find it too hard to find us, here is a shortcut.

The Cyberspace Association should be for Domain Name Owners what an Automobile Association is for car-owners.

By the year 2000, ICANN was promised to be a democratically run non-profit organization (under California Law) , with an elected Board that will set policy in the internet world of Domain Names, IP numbers and root servers. It has already set policy, in the face of strong opposition by Domain Name owners, with regards to an expansion of Trade Mark rights on a Global scale.

Our IDNO is a constituency, unrecognized but potentially the largest, of the DNSO, the stakeholders in the Domain Name arena.

We endeavour to represent the Individual Domain Name Owner.

We perceive that Domain Name Ownership needs vigilant advocacy in order to be secure.

We have an on-line voting system in place , that will help us run our constituency on the most democratic lines. Our representatives on the DNSO will be elected by the entire membership, from a General Assembly of members.

This discussion list implements a policy of maintaining civil discourse. Non-members who wish to post their opinions would help the clarity of the discussion by providing a brief introduction of their position, especially if they are partisans for other constituencies.

For detailed list rules, click here.

If you are too busy to follow all our deliberations and discussions, you can follow the same method to subscribe to the one-way low volume idno-announce mailing list.


Arguments for having a separate Constituency for Individuals can be found here.

The Internet Governance Committee of the ACM supports a constituency for Individual DN owners.

In Santiago, we not only gained the support of the non-commercial Domain Name holders constituency, but also of the General Assembly of ICANN's DNSO

In Yokohama, the General Assembly of the DNSO voted overwhelmingly (67/3) in favour of the considered admittance of a Constituency of Individual DN owners into the DNSO and the Names Council resolved to create a Special Task force to review the DNSO structure.

However, how much influence the General Assembly of the DNSO has is questionable.

We need the numbers. We need you.

join the cyberspace association
Join the Cyberspace Association

Joining criteria: Owning a Domain Name as an individual and having administrative control over it. A domain name registered by a company only gives it's owner the right to join, not the company.

Both commercial and non-commercial individuals are welcome to join, especially those who do not see commercial activity or non-activity as the defining reason for participating in the DNSO.

Organisations do not belong in this constituency, but individuals who have personally paid for organisations' Domains, do.

Mission Statement: To be a voice for the Individual DN owners in the DNSO, to work for their interests and to provide representation for them on the Names Council.

If this proves impossible, our mission is to represent your interests in Global fora in the widest sense.

Express your support by becoming a Member!

Funding: No joining fees have been set yet, but realistically, the bootstrap members cannot be expected to fund the cost of the Association's representations from their own pockets indefinitely.

Constituency Bootstrap: Joop Teernstra LL.M.

For the Initial Steering Committee that served the IDNO for a 3 months period that ended October 20, the following members were elected:

Karl Auerbach, Dan Steinberg, William X. Walsh, Mikki Barry, Kevin Kelly, Srikanth Narra, Roeland Meyer, Bradley Thornton, Dietmar Stefitz, Arnold Gehring, Andy Gardner,Rachel Luxemburg, Karl E.Peters, Joe Abley, Mark Langston, Dennis Schaefer, David Zanetti, Rod Dixon, Mark Measday, Joan Faber and Allan Speedy

The first steering committee, in spite of the energetic efforts of many of the members, ended in chaos due to its ill defined role and powers. Personality conflicts played an important part.

A re-railing proposal was adopted by the membership, paving the way for new Charter provisions and a new executive committee with a well defined mandate.

The Charter has been completed and ratified by the members in sept. 2000.

The discussion list functions as a General Assembly of members from which elections for all Committees will proceed.

Statements by the founders and other members standing for elective office can be read by clicking on their names under the members button, where founding members who have joined before the Berlin meeting are listed. Other members are listed unless they have expressed the wish not to be listed.

(last updated 26 August, 2004)


[ DADNO | Polling Booth | Organization |DNSO Constituencies | Join | Petition | Funding | Discussion List | Home ]